Michael Redden v. Tim Baird, et al
Plaintiff: MICHAEL REDDEN
Defendant: TIM BAIRD and ROSS TOWNSHIP, OH
Case Number: 26-3535
Filed: June 15, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 16, 2026 Filing 6 MEDIATION OFFICE is involved in this appeal. IN-PERSON CONFERENCE: A Mediation conference has been scheduled for 07/15/2026 at 9:30 AM (ET) with John A. Minter. [Please open notice for important details and deadlines.] (LMR) [Entered: 06/16/2026 11:52 AM]
June 15, 2026 Filing 5 TRANSCRIPT ORDER filed - no hearings held in District Court. Filed by Mr. Joshua Adam Engel for Michael Redden. Certificate of Service: 06/15/2026. [26-3535] (JAE) [Entered: 06/15/2026 09:31 PM]
June 15, 2026 Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Name of Counsel: Joshua Engel ; Michael Redden makes the following disclosure: 1. Is said party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation? No 2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to the appeal, with a financial interest in the outcome? No Certificate of Service: 06/15/2026. [26-3535] (JAE) [Entered: 06/15/2026 09:30 PM]
June 15, 2026 Filing 3 CIVIL APPEAL STATEMENT OF PARTIES AND ISSUES filed by Attorney Mr. Joshua Adam Engel for Appellant Michael Redden. Is this case a cross-appeal? No ; Has this case or a related one been before this court previously? No ; Please identify the party(ies) the appeal is being taken against: Tim Baird and Ross Township, OH ; Issues: Viewing the record in the light most favorable to Plaintiff, whether there was a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether Baird's actions violated Redden's constitutional right to not be arrested in the absence of probable cause. Viewing the record in the light most favorable to Plaintiff, whether there was a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether Ross Township maintained a policy or custom of inadequate supervision on probable cause determinations. Whether qualified immunity is available for Defendants. . Certificate of Service: 06/15/2026. [26-3535] (JAE) [Entered: 06/15/2026 09:29 PM]
June 15, 2026 Filing 2 APPEARANCE filed for Appellant Michael Redden by Joshua Engel. Certificate of Service: 06/15/2026. [26-3535] (JAE) [Entered: 06/15/2026 09:24 PM]
June 15, 2026 Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Michael Redden. Transcript needed: n. (MMP) [Entered: 06/15/2026 02:51 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Michael Redden v. Tim Baird, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MICHAEL REDDEN
Represented By: Joshua Adam Engel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TIM BAIRD
Represented By: Dawn M. Frick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROSS TOWNSHIP, OH
Represented By: Dawn M. Frick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?