In re: Michael Jones
| In re: MICHAEL JONES |
| WARDEN JERRY SPATNY |
| 26-3758 |
| August 21, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 RULING LETTER SENT directing Movant Mr. Michael Jones to file a corrected second successive habeas motion. (GSA) [Entered: 08/21/2026 12:02 PM] |
| Filing 2 Copy of District Court Order filed to transfer proceedings to the Sixth Circuit. (GSA) [Entered: 08/21/2026 11:58 AM] |
| Filing 1 Second Successive Motion Docketed. Notice filed by Movant Mr. Michael Jones. 2nd/Successive Motion Received in 6CA: 08/21/2026. (GSA) [Entered: 08/21/2026 11:57 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Michael Jones | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: MICHAEL JONES | |
| Represented By: | Michael Jones |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: WARDEN JERRY SPATNY | |
| Represented By: | Jerri L. Fosnaught |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.