Roxana Ascencio-Blanco, et al v. Todd Blanche
| ROXANA CAROLINA ASCENCIO-BLANCO, MARCOS DANIEL ASCENCIO-BLANCO and BARBARA GABRIELA ASCENCIO-BLANCO |
| TODD W. BLANCHE, U.S. Attorney General |
| 26-3791 |
| August 28, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE filed for Respondent Mr. Todd W. Blanche by Thankful T. Vanderstar. Certificate of Service: 08/31/2026. [26-3791] (TTV) [Entered: 08/31/2026 09:58 AM] |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Name of Counsel: Margaret W. Wong ; Ms. Barbara Gabriela Ascencio-Blanco, Mr. Marcos Daniel Ascencio-Blanco and Ms. Roxana Carolina Ascencio-Blanco makes the following disclosure: 1. Is said party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation? no no 2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to the appeal, with a financial interest in the outcome? no Certificate of Service: 08/28/2026. [26-3791] (MWW) [Entered: 08/28/2026 04:09 PM] |
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE filed for Petitioners Ms. Barbara Gabriela Ascencio-Blanco, Mr. Marcos Daniel Ascencio-Blanco and Ms. Roxana Carolina Ascencio-Blanco by Margaret W. Wong. Certificate of Service: 08/28/2026. [26-3791] (MWW) [Entered: 08/28/2026 04:07 PM] |
| Filing 1 Agency Case Docketed. Notice filed by Petitioners Ms. Barbara Gabriela Ascencio-Blanco, Mr. Marcos Daniel Ascencio-Blanco and Ms. Roxana Carolina Ascencio-Blanco. Originating Case No: A 208 751 886,A 208 751 887,A 216 212 146. Petition Received in 6CA: 08/28/2026. (VLP) [Entered: 08/28/2026 03:40 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
