Larry Nalls v. William Chicote
Petitioner: LARRY NALLS
Respondent: WILLIAM CHICOTE, Warden
Case Number: 26-3817
Filed: September 9, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2026 Filing 3 LETTER SENT to Mr. Larry Nalls, regarding the amended caption. (JBO) [Entered: 09/11/2026 12:30 PM]
September 9, 2026 Filing 2 Respondent not served. Petition dismissed in district court without service on respondent. (JBO) [Entered: 09/09/2026 10:28 AM]
September 9, 2026 Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed with certificate of appealability denied in district court on 8/19/26. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Larry Nalls. Transcript needed: n. (JBO) [Entered: 09/09/2026 10:24 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Larry Nalls v. William Chicote
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: LARRY NALLS
Represented By: Larry Nalls
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: WILLIAM CHICOTE, Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?