Marley Fernandez Perez v. Todd Blanche
| MARLEY FERNANDEZ PEREZ |
| TODD W. BLANCHE, U.S. Attorney General |
| 26-3856 |
| September 18, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ***DOCUMENT LOCKED COUNSEL INSTRUCTED TO REFILE AS A NOTIFICATION***CERTIFIED LIST filed. Certificate of Service: 09/18/2026. [26-3856]--[Edited 09/22/2026 by MRL] (BG) [Entered: 09/22/2026 01:03 PM] |
| Filing 9 NOTIFICATION filed by Mr. Christopher Buchanan for Mr. Todd W. Blanche regarding removal status. Details: not in custody; no removal date. Certificate of Service: 09/21/2026. [26-3856] (CB) [Entered: 09/21/2026 04:17 PM] |
| Filing 8 APPEARANCE filed for Respondent Mr. Todd W. Blanche by Christopher B. Buchanan. Certificate of Service: 09/21/2026. [26-3856] (CB) [Entered: 09/21/2026 09:13 AM] |
| Filing 7 ***DOCUMENT LOCKED DUPLICATE ENTRY***APPEARANCE filed for Respondent Mr. Todd W. Blanche by Christopher Buchanan. Certificate of Service: 09/21/2026. [26-3856]--[Edited 09/21/2026 by MRL] (CB) [Entered: 09/21/2026 08:56 AM] |
| Filing 6 ***DOCUMENT LOCKED COUNSEL INSTRUCTED TO REFILE WITH THE CORRECT ATTORNEY'S NAME HE IS REPLACING***APPEARANCE filed for Respondent Mr. Todd W. Blanche by Christopher B. Buchanan. Certificate of Service: 09/21/2026. [26-3856]--[Edited 09/21/2026 by MRL] (CB) [Entered: 09/21/2026 07:42 AM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION filed by Mr. Behzad Ghassemi for Mr. Marley Fernandez Perez for a stay of removal. Certificate of Service: 09/18/2026. [26-3856] (BG) [Entered: 09/18/2026 07:15 PM] |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Name of Counsel: Behzad Ghassemi ; Mr. Marley Fernandez Perez makes the following disclosure: 1. Is said party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation? No No 2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to the appeal, with a financial interest in the outcome? No Certificate of Service: 09/18/2026. [26-3856] (BG) [Entered: 09/18/2026 07:12 PM] |
| Filing 3 ***DOCUMENT LOCKED COUNSEL INSTRUCTED TO REFILE AS A CIVIL APPEALS STATEMENT***APPEARANCE filed for Petitioner Mr. Marley Fernandez Perez by Behzad Ghassemi. Certificate of Service: 09/18/2026. [26-3856]--[Edited 09/18/2026 by MRL] (BG) [Entered: 09/18/2026 03:39 PM] |
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE filed for Petitioner Mr. Marley Fernandez Perez by Behzad Ghassemi. Certificate of Service: 09/18/2026. [26-3856] (BG) [Entered: 09/18/2026 03:15 PM] |
| Filing 1 Agency Case Docketed. Notice filed by Petitioner Mr. Marley Fernandez Perez. Originating Case No: A 244 719 162. Petition Received in 6CA: 09/18/2026. (MRL) [Entered: 09/18/2026 02:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Marley Fernandez Perez v. Todd Blanche | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: MARLEY FERNANDEZ PEREZ | |
| Represented By: | Behzad Ghassemi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: TODD W. BLANCHE, U.S. Attorney General | |
| Represented By: | Office of Immigration Litigation |
| Represented By: | Christopher Buchanan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.