Earl Rayford v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al
| EARL J. RAYFORD |
| WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., LOGS LEGAL GROUP LLP, NATHAN DUVELIUS and CARL WESLEY PAGLES |
| 26-5530 |
| June 12, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting pro se briefing schedule: appellant brief due 09/03/2026, appellee brief due 10/05/2026. (ASM) [Entered: 07/22/2026 07:35 AM] |
| Filing 6 Update fee status change to paid 7/21/2026. (ASM) [Entered: 07/21/2026 02:23 PM] |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Name of Counsel: Brian D. Sullivan ; LOGS Legal Group LLP makes the following disclosure: 1. Is said party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation? No. 2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to the appeal, with a financial interest in the outcome? No Certificate of Service: 07/08/2026. [26-5530] (BDS) [Entered: 07/08/2026 01:50 PM] |
| Filing 4 LETTER SENT to Mr. Earl J. Rayford, regarding case opening documents. (ASM) [Entered: 07/07/2026 07:12 AM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees LOGS Legal Group LLP, Mr. Nathan Duvelius and Mr. Carl Wesley Pagles by Steven B. Lowery. Certificate of Service: 07/06/2026. [26-5530] (SBL) [Entered: 07/06/2026 02:13 PM] |
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees LOGS Legal Group LLP, Mr. Nathan Duvelius and Mr. Carl Wesley Pagles by Brian D. Sulllivan. Certificate of Service: 07/06/2026. [26-5530] (BDS) [Entered: 07/06/2026 01:58 PM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Earl J. Rayford. Transcript needed: n. (ASM) [Entered: 06/12/2026 10:46 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
