Mark Stinson, Sr. v. Nathan Brooks, et al
| MARK T. STINSON |
| NATHAN PATRICK BROOKS, AUSA, DAMON KEITH GRIFFIN, SR., AUSA, D. MICHAEL DUNAVANT, USA and EDWARD L. STANTON, III, USA |
| 26-5566 |
| June 26, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other Fraud |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. Mark T. Stinson to supplement certified record, to take judicial notice. Certificate of service: 07/28/2026. (RGF) [Entered: 07/28/2026 11:00 AM] |
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT filed regarding motion to proceed ifp previously filed by Mr. Mark T. Stinson in 26-5566. Certificate of service:07/27/2026. (RGF) [Entered: 07/27/2026 11:24 AM] |
| Filing 7 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. Mark T. Stinson for MOTION FOR PROCEDURAL RELIEF AND CONSOLIDATION OF ACCESSIBILITY PROTECTIONS. Certificate of service: 07/20/2026. (RGF) [Entered: 07/20/2026 01:09 PM] |
Filing 6
ORDER filed granting motion to amend caption [ # 2 ]. Upon review, the plaintiffs motion to amend the caption is GRANTED, and the clerk will remove the suffix Sr. However, the plaintiff is advised that Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act does not apply to the federal judiciary. Torrence v. U.S. Bankr. Ct. for the N.D. Ill., No. 17-C-3120, 2017 WL 3593116, at *4 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 21, 2017) (Similarly, the Rehabilitation Act does not apply to the federal courts: it only covers Executive agencies, the United States Postal Service, and certain categories of programs and activities receiving Federal funding.). Although the court provides services to individuals with communications disabilities, these accommodations are generally limited to courtroom proceedings. Guide to Judiciary Policy, Vol. 5, Ch. 2 255. If the plaintiff seeks specific relief from the Rules, he may file an appropriate motion. The clerk will terminate the motion on the docket. (RGF) [Entered: 07/20/2026 09:33 AM]
|
| Filing 8 APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Mr. Mark T. Stinson Certificate of Service:07/14/2026. Argument Request: PRO SE (RGF) [Entered: 07/22/2026 11:05 AM] |
| Filing 5 APPELLANT BRIEF TENDERED. Received from Mr. Mark T. Stinson, Sr.. Copies: 01. Certificate of Service: 07/14/2026. Corrections to be made: Currently no briefing schedule.. (RGF) [Entered: 07/14/2026 12:58 PM] |
| Filing 4 Financial Affidavit filed by Party Mr. Mark T. Stinson, Sr. Certificate of Service: 06/29/2026. (RGF) [Entered: 06/29/2026 09:40 AM] |
| Filing 3 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. Mark T. Stinson, Sr. to proceed in forma pauperis. Certificate of service: 06/29/2026. (RGF) [Entered: 06/29/2026 09:38 AM] |
| Filing 2 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. Mark T. Stinson, Sr. to amend case caption. Certificate of service: 06/29/2026. (RGF) [Entered: 06/29/2026 09:29 AM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Mark T. Stinson, Sr.. Transcript needed: n. (RGF) [Entered: 06/26/2026 10:42 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
