Daniel FeldmanIn re: Daniel Feldman
| In re: DANIEL FELDMAN |
| 26-5686 |
| August 6, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Financial Affidavit filed by Party Mr. Daniel Feldman. Certificate of Service: 08/06/2026. (GSA) [Entered: 08/06/2026 02:51 PM] |
| Filing 3 Petitioner MOTION filed by Mr. Daniel Feldman to proceed in forma pauperis. Certificate of Service: 08/06/2026. (GSA) [Entered: 08/06/2026 02:50 PM] |
| Filing 2 NOTIFICATION filed by Mr. Daniel Feldman regarding Emergency Notice: completed nonpublic ifp application is also essential evidence for the docketed rule 21 petition; resubmission and request for immediate routing. Certificate of Service: 08/06/2026. (GSA) [Entered: 08/06/2026 02:41 PM] |
| Filing 1 Writ of Mandamus filed. Notice filed by Petitioner Mr. Daniel Feldman. Petition Received in 6CA: 08/03/2026. (GSA) [Entered: 08/06/2026 12:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Daniel FeldmanIn re: Daniel Feldman | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: DANIEL FELDMAN | |
| Represented By: | Daniel Feldman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
