In re: Jerry Lotz
| In re: JERRY DAVID LOTZ |
| DANNY DODD |
| 26-5718 |
| August 14, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 RULING LETTER SENT directing Movant Mr. Jerry David Lotz to file a corrected second successive habeas motion. (ASM) [Entered: 08/14/2026 10:37 AM] |
| Filing 2 Copy of District Court Order filed to transfer proceedings to Sixth Circuit. (ASM) [Entered: 08/14/2026 10:34 AM] |
| Filing 1 Transferred Second Successive Motion Docketed. Notice filed by Movant Mr. Jerry David Lotz. 2nd/Successive Motion Received in 6CA: 08/13/2026. (ASM) [Entered: 08/14/2026 10:31 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Jerry Lotz | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: JERRY DAVID LOTZ | |
| Represented By: | Jerry David Lotz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: DANNY DODD | |
| Represented By: | Todd D. Ferguson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
