In re: Mark Stinson
Petitioner: In re: MARK T. STINSON
Case Number: 26-5798
Filed: September 10, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2026 Filing 4 Petitioner MOTION filed by Mr. Mark T. Stinson for reasonable accommodations pursuant the ADA . Certificate of Service:09/11/2026. (JEC) [Entered: 09/11/2026 12:23 PM]
September 10, 2026 Filing 3 Financial Affidavit filed by Party Mr. Mark T. Stinson Certificate of Service: 09/10/2026. (JEC) [Entered: 09/10/2026 10:48 AM]
September 10, 2026 Filing 2 Petitioner MOTION filed by Mr. Mark T. Stinson to proceed in forma pauperis. Certificate of Service:09/10/2026. (JEC) [Entered: 09/10/2026 10:47 AM]
September 10, 2026 Filing 1 Writ of Mandamus filed. Notice filed by Petitioner Mr. Mark T. Stinson. Petition Received in 6CA: 09/10/2026. (JEC) [Entered: 09/10/2026 10:45 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: Mark Stinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: MARK T. STINSON
Represented By: Mark T. Stinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?