Estate of Nicholas D. Rice v. Correctional Medical Services, et al
Plaintiff - Appellant: ESTATE OF NICHOLAS D. RICE, deceased by: RICK D. RICE and DIANE J. WALDROP, co-personal representatives
Defendant - Appellee: CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, a Missouri Corporation, MICHAEL BOOKS, Sheriff, BRAD ROGERS, Captain, OAKLAWN PSYCHIATRIC CENTER, INCORPORATED, an Indiana Corporation and SALVADOR CENICEROS, M.D.
Case Number: 09-2804
Filed: July 16, 2009
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 20, 2012 Summary Estate of Rice v. Corr. Med. Servs.

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 701724567 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Rovner. The district court's entry of summary judgment in favor of the defendants in no. 09-2804 is AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part, the district court's decision to dismiss on the basis of collateral estoppel in No. 10-2389 is REVERSED. Both cases are REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Joel M. Flaum, Circuit Judge; Ilana Diamond Rovner, Circuit Judge and Terence T. Evans, Circuit Judge. [6382903-3] [6382903] [09-2804, 10-2389]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Estate of Nicholas D. Rice v. Correctional Medical Services, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: ESTATE OF NICHOLAS D. RICE, deceased by: RICK D. RICE and DIANE J. WALDROP, co-personal representatives
Represented By: Michael R. Dezsi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, a Missouri Corporation
Represented By: Beth E. Hanan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: MICHAEL BOOKS, Sheriff
Represented By: Melanie L. Farr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: BRAD ROGERS, Captain
Represented By: Melanie L. Farr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: OAKLAWN PSYCHIATRIC CENTER, INCORPORATED, an Indiana Corporation
Represented By: Lyle R. Hardman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: SALVADOR CENICEROS, M.D.
Represented By: David C. Jesen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?