Lindquist Ford, Incorporated, et al v. Middleton Motors, Incorporated
| LINDQUIST FORD, INCORPORATED, STEVEN LINDQUIST and CRAIG MILLER |
| MIDDLETON MOTORS, INCORPORATED |
| 09-3883 |
| November 30, 2009 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Contract Actions |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Lindquist Ford, Inc. v. Middleton Motors, Inc.
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
701609825
Filed opinion of the court by Judge Sykes. We REVERSE the judgment below and REMAND with instructions to enter judgment for Middleton. There is one remaining loose end to tie up. It is undisputed that Middleton advanced $7,668 to Lindquist and Lindquist paid $6,503.53 to install a T-1 data line. These amounts nearly offset each other, and Middleton asks that our remand include instructions to enter judgment in its favor for the difference. Because Lindquist is not entitled to quasi-contractual compensation for Miller's services under either quantum meruit or unjust enrichment, Middleton is correct that Middleton has conceded, however, that it must repay the $6,503.53 expense Lindquist incurred to install the T-1 line. This leaves a net recovery for Middleton of $1,164.74. Judgment should be entered accordingly. Frank H. Easterbrook, Chief Judge; Diane S. Sykes, Circuit Judge and John Daniel Tinder, Circuit Judge. [6337015-3] [6337015] [09-3883]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
