Lisa Pakovich v. Verizon LTD plan
Plaintiff - Appellee: LISA PAKOVICH
Defendant - Appellant: VERIZON LTD PLAN
Case Number: 10-1889
Filed: April 13, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 22, 2011 Summary Pakovich v. Verizon LTD Plan

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 701577270 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Flaum. We VACATE the district court's decision granting summary judgment for Pakovich on her benefits claim, and AFFIRM its denial of her fee request. Joel M. Flaum, Circuit Judge; Terence T. Evans, Circuit Judge and John Daniel Tinder, Circuit Judge. [6324587-3] [6324587] [10-1889, 10-3083]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Lisa Pakovich v. Verizon LTD plan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: LISA PAKOVICH
Represented By: Lee W. Barron
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: VERIZON LTD PLAN
Represented By: Craig G. Penrose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?