Tanisha Matthews v. Walmart
Plaintiff - Appellant: TANISHA MATTHEWS
Defendant - Appellee: WALMART, Incorporated, sued in its official capacity as a Retail Merchandise Store organized and existing under the Laws of the State of Illinois and located in the City of Joliet/County of Will 302 South Larkin Avenue Joliet, Illinois 60436
Case Number: 10-2242
Filed: May 20, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 31, 2011 Tanisha Matthews v. Walmart

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Tanisha Matthews v. Walmart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: TANISHA MATTHEWS
Represented By: Tanisha Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: WALMART, Incorporated, sued in its official capacity as a Retail Merchandise Store organized and existing under the Laws of the State of Illinois and located in the City of Joliet/County of Will 302 South Larkin Avenue Joliet, Illinois 60436
Represented By: Norma W. Zeitler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?