USA v. Willie Johnson
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| WILLIE EARL JOHNSON |
| 10-2503 |
| June 21, 2010 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
701561784
Filed opinion of the court by Judge Flaum. Johnson s sentence is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for the district court to consider his argument for a reduced crack-to-powder ratio. The district court s decision to attribute 23 grams of crack to Johnson is AFFIRMED. Richard A. Posner, Circuit Judge; Joel M. Flaum, Circuit Judge and Diane S. Sykes, Circuit Judge. [6318510-3] [6318510] [10-2503]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Willie Johnson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Matthew M. Getter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant: WILLIE EARL JOHNSON | |
| Represented By: | Thomas R. Mikrut |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
