Ramon Pena v. Kraft Foods Global, Incorporat
| RAMON PENA |
| KRAFT FOODS GLOBAL, INCORPORATED |
| 10-3073 |
| September 3, 2010 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Jobs |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
701586559
Filed opinion of the court by Judge Wood. The judgment of the district court granting summary judgment on Robles's claim is AFFIRMED and the grant of summary judgment on Diaz and Pena's claims is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings.. Michael S. Kanne, Circuit Judge; Diane P. Wood, Circuit Judge and Diane S. Sykes, Circuit Judge. [6328271-3] [6328271] [10-3073]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Ramon Pena v. Kraft Foods Global, Incorporat | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: RAMON PENA | |
| Represented By: | Ramon Pena |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: KRAFT FOODS GLOBAL, INCORPORATED | |
| Represented By: | Mary M. Moore |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
