Office Professional Employees, et al v. Air Methods Corporation
OFFICE AND PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 109 and OFFICE AND PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION |
AIR METHODS CORPORATION |
10-3405 |
October 14, 2010 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Railway Labor Act |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Office Professional Employees, et al v. Air Methods Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellee: OFFICE AND PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 109 | |
Represented By: | Douglas J. Phebus |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellee: OFFICE AND PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION | |
Represented By: | Douglas J. Phebus |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellant: AIR METHODS CORPORATION | |
Represented By: | Daniel M. Combs |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.