Susan Schaefer-LaRose v. Eli Lilly & Company
| SUSAN SCHAEFER-LAROSE |
| ELI LILLY & COMPANY |
| 10-3855 |
| December 14, 2010 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
|
|
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
701757929
Filed opinion of the court by Judge Ripple. These two cases have been consolidated for opinion. No. 10-3855 is AFFIRMED; Nos. 11-1980 and 11-2131 are REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions. Frank H. Easterbrook, Chief Judge; Kenneth F. Ripple, Circuit Judge and Michael S. Kanne, Circuit Judge. [6395994-3] [6395994] [10-3855, 11-1980, 11-2131]--[Edited 05/08/2012 by KH to correct docket text]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Susan Schaefer-LaRose v. Eli Lilly & Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: SUSAN SCHAEFER-LAROSE | |
| Represented By: | Stephen A. Weiss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: ELI LILLY & COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | David S. Wagner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.