Michael Thompson, et al v. Retirement Plan for SC Johnson, et al
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL J. THOMPSON, DAVID A. TROESTLER, JAMES PATRICK JOHNSON, ROBERT K. AULT and TERRY CONLON
Defendant - Appellee: RETIREMENT PLAN FOR SC JOHNSON AND SON, INCORPORATED and RETIREMENT PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF JOHNSON DIVERSEY, INCORPORATED
Case Number: 10-3917
Filed: December 21, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 22, 2011 Summary Thompson v. Retirement Plan for SC Johnson

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 701558193 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Cudahy. AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part and REMANDED for proceedings consistent with this opinion. Richard D. Cudahy, Circuit Judge; Michael S. Kanne, Circuit Judge and John Daniel Tinder, Circuit Judge. [6317229-3] [6317229] [10-3917, 10-3918, 10-3988, 10-3989]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Michael Thompson, et al v. Retirement Plan for SC Johnson, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: MICHAEL J. THOMPSON
Represented By: Eli Gottesdiener
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: DAVID A. TROESTLER
Represented By: Eli Gottesdiener
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: JAMES PATRICK JOHNSON
Represented By: Eli Gottesdiener
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: ROBERT K. AULT
Represented By: Eli Gottesdiener
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: TERRY CONLON
Represented By: Eli Gottesdiener
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: RETIREMENT PLAN FOR SC JOHNSON AND SON, INCORPORATED
Represented By: Susan R. Maisa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: RETIREMENT PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF JOHNSON DIVERSEY, INCORPORATED
Represented By: Lawrence C. DiNardo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?