Bloomfield State Bank v. IRS
| BLOOMFIELD STATE BANK |
| INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE |
| 10-3939 |
| December 23, 2010 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Tax Suits |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Bloomfield State Bank v. United States
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
701533200
Filed opinion of the court by Judge Posner. The judgement is REVERSED and the case REMANDED with directions to enter judgment for the bank. Richard A. Posner, Circuit Judge; Diane P. Wood, Circuit Judge and John Daniel Tinder, Circuit Judge. [6307317-3] [6307317] [10-3939]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Bloomfield State Bank v. IRS | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: BLOOMFIELD STATE BANK | |
| Represented By: | R. Brock Jordan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE | |
| Represented By: | Gabrielle G. Hirz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
