Edward Raybourne v. CIGNA Life Insurance Company o
| EDWARD RAYBOURNE |
| CIGNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK |
| 11-1295 |
| February 7, 2011 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Employee Retirement |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Raybourne v. CIGNA Life Ins. Co. of NY
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
701886761
Filed opinion of the court by Judge Rovner. AFFIRMED. Ilana Diamond Rovner, Circuit Judge; Diane P. Wood, Circuit Judge and Ann Claire Williams, Circuit Judge. [6444651-1] [6444651] [11-1295, 11-1427]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Edward Raybourne v. CIGNA Life Insurance Company o | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee: EDWARD RAYBOURNE | |
| Represented By: | Mark D. DeBofsky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant: CIGNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK | |
| Represented By: | Daniel K. Ryan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
