USA v. Kenneth Jone
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
KENNETH JONES |
11-2267 |
June 6, 2011 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 702294765 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Tinder. Jones s convictions on Count Eleven and Count Twelve are AFFIRMED, and his sentence is VACATED and REMANDED for resentencing consistent with Dorsey; Drake s conviction is AFFIRMED and her sentence is VACATED and REMANDED for resentencing consistent with Alleyne; Young s conviction is AFFIRMED; and Mockabee s sentence is VACATED and REMANDED for resentencing consistent with Peugh. Diane P. Wood, Chief Judge; William J. Bauer, Circuit Judge and John Daniel Tinder, Circuit Judge. [6598575-1] [6598575] [11-2267, 11-2288, 11-2535, 11-2687] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Kenneth Jone | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Bradley A. Blackington |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellant: KENNETH JONES | |
Represented By: | Victoria Ursulskis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.