Chicago Title Land Trust Compa, et al v. Potash Corporation of Saskatc, et al
CHICAGO TITLE LAND TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee under Trust Agreement dated August 1, 1984, and known as Trust No. 62111, and Trust No. A7706211106, MARK GOODMAN and HARMS ROAD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP |
POTASH CORPORATION OF SASKATCHEWAN, INCORPORATED, POTASH CORPORATION OF SASKATCHEWAN SALES, LIMITED and PCS SALES (CANADA) INCORPORATED |
11-2374 |
June 17, 2011 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other Contract Actions |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Chicago Title Land Trust Co. v. Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan Sales, Ltd. |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 701671524 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Tinder. Plaintiffs ask us to certify questions to the Illinois Supreme Court. Because their proposed questions relate to the Corporate Suit and do not control the outcome of this appeal, their motion is DENIED. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Daniel A. Manion, Circuit Judge; Ann Claire Williams, Circuit Judge and John Daniel Tinder, Circuit Judge. [6361855-3] [6361855] [11-2374] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Chicago Title Land Trust Compa, et al v. Potash Corporation of Saskatc, et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: CHICAGO TITLE LAND TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee under Trust Agreement dated August 1, 1984, and known as Trust No. 62111, and Trust No. A7706211106 | |
Represented By: | Philip J. Nathanson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: MARK GOODMAN | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: HARMS ROAD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | |
Represented By: | Philip J. Nathanson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: POTASH CORPORATION OF SASKATCHEWAN, INCORPORATED | |
Represented By: | Kenneth E. Rechtoris |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: POTASH CORPORATION OF SASKATCHEWAN SALES, LIMITED | |
Represented By: | Kenneth E. Rechtoris |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: PCS SALES (CANADA) INCORPORATED | |
Represented By: | Kenneth E. Rechtoris |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.