Peter Poole, III v. Debbie Issac
| PETER POOLE, III |
| DEBBIE ISSACS, Healthcare Administrator |
| 11-2903 |
| August 19, 2011 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
|
|
|
|
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
701908349
Filed opinion of the court by Judge Wood. We have reviewed Poole's remaining arguments, and none has merit. Indeed, both the original lawsuit and this appeal are so lacking in merit that they warrant the imposition of two strikes under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Frank H. Easterbrook, Chief Judge; Diane P. Wood, Circuit Judge and Diane S. Sykes, Circuit Judge. [6452958-1] [6452958] [11-2903]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Peter Poole, III v. Debbie Issac | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: PETER POOLE, III | |
| Represented By: | Peter Poole |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: DEBBIE ISSACS, Healthcare Administrator | |
| Represented By: | Jan E. Hughes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.