USA v. Charlie Lawuary
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: CHARLIE LAWUARY
Case Number: 11-3126
Filed: September 19, 2011
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions-Mandamus/Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 8, 2012 Summary United States v. Lawuary

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 701698687 Filed opinion of the court by Chief Judge Easterbrook. The appeal is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction. Frank H. Easterbrook, Chief Judge; Joel M. Flaum, Circuit Judge and Daniel A. Manion, Circuit Judge. [6372605-3] [6372605] [11-3126]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Charlie Lawuary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: David E. Risley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: CHARLIE LAWUARY
Represented By: Charlie Lawuary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?