Ira Holtzman v. Gregory Turza

Ira Holtzman v. Gregory Turza

Plaintiff - Appellee:	IRA HOLTZMAN, individually and as the representative of a class of similarly situated persons
Defendant - Appellant:	GREGORY P. TURZA
Case Number:	11-3188
Filed:	September 26, 2011
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Presiding Judge:	Maryland Unassigned
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed	Description
August 26, 2013	Holtzman v. Turza

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 26, 2013	Filing 702061094 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Easterbrook. The district court's decision on the merits is AFFIRMED, but the remedial order is VACATED. The case is REMANDED with instructions to enter a judgment requiring Turza to remit to the registry or to a third-party administrator. Once the court knows what funds are available for distribution, it should (if necessary) reconsider how any remainder will be applied. It may also be necessary to reconsider the "incentive award" to the representative plaintiff (which appears to be a "disincentive award") and the way in which the class counsel are compensated. See Boeing Co. v. Van Gemert, 444 U.S. 472 (1980). Frank H. Easterbrook, Chief Judge; Ann Claire Williams, Circuit Judge and John Daniel Tinder, Circuit Judge. [6510549-1] [6510549] [11-3188, 11-3746]

Date Filed

Document Text

August 26, 2013

Filing 702061094 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Easterbrook. The district court's decision on the merits is AFFIRMED, but the remedial order is VACATED. The case is REMANDED with instructions to enter a judgment requiring Turza to remit to the registry or to a third-party administrator. Once the court knows what funds are available for distribution, it should (if necessary) reconsider how any remainder will be applied. It may also be necessary to reconsider the "incentive award" to the representative plaintiff (which appears to be a "disincentive award") and the way in which the class counsel are compensated. See Boeing Co. v. Van Gemert, 444 U.S. 472 (1980). Frank H. Easterbrook, Chief Judge; Ann Claire Williams, Circuit Judge and John Daniel Tinder, Circuit Judge. [6510549-1] [6510549] [11-3188, 11-3746]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ira Holtzman v. Gregory Turza
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: IRA HOLTZMAN, individually and as the representative of a class of similarly situated persons
Represented By:	Brian J. Wanca
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: GREGORY P. TURZA
Represented By:	Steven D. Pearson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?