Anthony Weddington v. Alan Finnan
Petitioner - Appellant: ANTHONY WEDDINGTON
Respondent - Appellee: ALAN FINNAN
Case Number: 11-3303
Filed: October 12, 2011
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 1, 2013 Summary Weddington v. Finnan

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 702045630 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Tinder. The denial of Weddington s habeas petition is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Circuit Rule 36 shall apply on remand. Kenneth F. Ripple, Circuit Judge; John Daniel Tinder, Circuit Judge and James B. Zagel, District Court Judge. [6504802-1] [6504802] [11-3303]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Anthony Weddington v. Alan Finnan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: ANTHONY WEDDINGTON
Represented By: Anthony Weddington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: ALAN FINNAN
Represented By: Henry A. Flores
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?