Christopher Mosley v. Mike Atchison
CHRISTOPHER MOSLEY |
CHARLES L. HINSLEY |
12-1083 |
January 12, 2012 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Habeas Corpus |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 701815211 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Hamitlon. We AFFIRM the district court's determination that Mosely has met the requirement of 28 U.S.C. 2254(d). We VACATE, however, the district court s grant of Mosley s habeas petition and REMAND for a determination of whether, based on new evidence not available to the state appellate court, Mosley s trial counsel was in fact constitutionally ineffective. William J. Bauer, Circuit Judge; Ilana Diamond Rovner, Circuit Judge and David F. Hamilton, Circuit Judge. [6417785-3] [6417785] [12-1083] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Christopher Mosley v. Mike Atchison | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner - appellee: CHRISTOPHER MOSLEY | |
Represented By: | Michael T. Brody |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent - appellant: CHARLES L. HINSLEY | |
Represented By: | Katherine D. Saunders |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.