USA v. Santiago Gutierrez-Ceja
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
SANTIAGO GUTIERREZ-CEJA |
12-1388 |
February 21, 2012 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 701966092 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Posner. We MODIFY the judgment of the district court to eliminate the post-release terms concerning the use of controlled substances, drug tests, and collection of a DNA sample, GRANTING the lawyer's motion to withdraw, and, having corrected the judgment, DISMISSING the appeal. Richard A. Posner, Circuit Judge; Ann Claire Williams, Circuit Judge and Diane S. Sykes, Circuit Judge. [6474939-1] [6474939] [12-1388] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Santiago Gutierrez-Ceja | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Scott Vincent Bruner |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: SANTIAGO GUTIERREZ-CEJA | |
Represented By: | Carol A. Brook |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.