Kevin Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plast
KEVIN KASTEN |
SAINT-GOBAIN PERFORMANCE PLASTICS CORPORATION |
12-1671 |
March 22, 2012 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Fair Labor Standards Act |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp. |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 701891508 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Flaum. We REVERSE the grant of summary judgment in Saint-Gobain's favor and REMAND for further proceedings. William J. Bauer, Circuit Judge; Joel M. Flaum, Circuit Judge and Diane P. Wood, Circuit Judge. [6446508-1] [6446508] [12-1671] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Kevin Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plast | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: KEVIN KASTEN | |
Represented By: | James H. Kaster |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: SAINT-GOBAIN PERFORMANCE PLASTICS CORPORATION | |
Represented By: | Thomas P. Godar |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.