Warnether Muhammad v. Caterpillar, Incorporated

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit Warnether Muhammad v. Caterpillar, Incorporated

Warnether Muhammad v. Caterpillar, Incorporated

Plaintiff - Appellant:	WARNETHER A. MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:	CATERPILLAR, INCORPORATED
Case Number:	12-1723
Filed:	March 27, 2012
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Jobs

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed	Description
September 9, 2014	Muhammad v. Caterpillar, Inc.
October 16, 2014	Warnether Muhammad v. Caterpillar Inc.

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 16, 2014	Filing 702334463 ORDER: Appellant Warnether A. Muhammad Petition for Rehearing is DENIED. The opinion issued in the above-entitled case on September 9, 2014, is hereby amended as follows: On page 5: in the second full paragraph, the last sentence starting We are not persuaded ... is deleted; On pages 5-6: the last paragraph of page 5 (starting First, Muhammad s argument ... ) ending on page 6 is deleted. On page 6: the first sentence of the first full paragraph is modified so that Second, even if we set that problem aside, another more is replaced by A , so that the sentence reads A fundamental obstacle .... On page 8: the first full paragraph (starting The first problem is ... ) is deleted, and the first two sentences of the second full paragraph are deleted, such that the second full paragraph begins with Muhammad has not identified ... [6613364-1] [6613364] [12-1723]
September 9, 2014	Filing 702309980 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Rovner. AFFIRMED. Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge; Ilana Diamond Rovner, Circuit Judge and Ann Claire Williams, Circuit Judge. [6604234-1] [6604234] [12-1723]

Date Filed

Document Text

October 16, 2014

Filing 702334463 ORDER: Appellant Warnether A. Muhammad Petition for Rehearing is DENIED. The opinion issued in the above-entitled case on September 9, 2014, is hereby amended as follows: On page 5: in the second full paragraph, the last sentence starting We are not persuaded ... is deleted; On pages 5-6: the last paragraph of page 5 (starting First, Muhammad s argument ... ) ending on page 6 is deleted. On page 6: the first sentence of the first full paragraph is modified so that Second, even if we set that problem aside, another more is replaced by A , so that the sentence reads A fundamental obstacle .... On page 8: the first full paragraph (starting The first problem is ... ) is deleted, and the first two sentences of the second full paragraph are deleted, such that the second full paragraph begins with Muhammad has not identified ... [6613364-1] [6613364] [12-1723]

September 9, 2014

Filing 702309980 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Rovner. AFFIRMED. Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge; Ilana Diamond Rovner, Circuit Judge and Ann Claire Williams, Circuit Judge. [6604234-1] [6604234] [12-1723]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Warnether Muhammad v. Caterpillar, Incorporated
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: WARNETHER A. MUHAMMAD
Represented By:	Donald R. Jackson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: CATERPILLAR, INCORPORATED
Represented By:	Joseph S. Turner
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?