Harlis Woods v. Illinois Department of Childre, et al
| HARLIS WOODS |
| ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, in their individual capacities, LUTHERAN CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES OF ILLINOIS INCORPORATED, in their individual capacities, MARGARET CORTWRIGHT, DCFS Caseworker, in her individual capacity, LUTHERBROOK CHILDREN'S CENTER, in their individual capacity and DIRECTOR OF LUTHERBROOK CHILDRENS CENTER |
| 12-2982 |
| August 28, 2012 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Woods v. IL Dep't of Children & Family Servs.
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
701962323
Filed opinion of the court by Judge Tinder. The district court's judgment of dismissal is MODIFIED to reflect that Woods's claim against IDCFS is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, and the judgment, as modified, is AFFIRMED. Daniel A. Manion, Circuit Judge; Michael S. Kanne, Circuit Judge and John Daniel Tinder, Circuit Judge. [6473483-1] [6473483] [12-2982]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Harlis Woods v. Illinois Department of Childre, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: HARLIS WOODS | |
| Represented By: | Steven A. Levy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, in their individual capacities | |
| Represented By: | Jan E. Hughes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: LUTHERAN CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES OF ILLINOIS INCORPORATED, in their individual capacities | |
| Represented By: | Stephen A. Kolodziej |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: MARGARET CORTWRIGHT, DCFS Caseworker, in her individual capacity | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: LUTHERBROOK CHILDREN'S CENTER, in their individual capacity | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: DIRECTOR OF LUTHERBROOK CHILDRENS CENTER | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
