General Association of Regular v. Hugh Scott
| GENERAL ASSOCIATION OF REGULAR BAPTIST CHURCHES, an Illinois not-for-profit corporation |
| HUGH SCOTT, a citizen of Texas |
| 13-1438 |
| February 28, 2013 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Fraud |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| General Association of Regular v. Hugh Scott |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
702115414
Filed Nonprecedential Disposition PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Diane P. Wood, Chief Judge; Joel M. Flaum, Circuit Judge and John Daniel Tinder, Circuit Judge. [6531394-1] [6531394] [13-1438]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: General Association of Regular v. Hugh Scott | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee: GENERAL ASSOCIATION OF REGULAR BAPTIST CHURCHES, an Illinois not-for-profit corporation | |
| Represented By: | David M. Gower |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant: HUGH SCOTT, a citizen of Texas | |
| Represented By: | Hugh Scott |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
