William Varellas v. United States Parole Commissi
| WILLIAM J. VARELLAS |
| UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION |
| 13-1582 |
| March 19, 2013 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| William Varellas v. United States Parole Commissi |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
702134302
Filed Nonprecedential Disposition PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Richard D. Cudahy, Circuit Judge; Ilana Diamond Rovner, Circuit Judge and Ann Claire Williams, Circuit Judge. [6538523-1] [6538523] [13-1582]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: William Varellas v. United States Parole Commissi | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: WILLIAM J. VARELLAS | |
| Represented By: | William J. Varellas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION | |
| Represented By: | Gerald A. Coraz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
