Bahram Nasserizafar v. Indiana Department of Transpo
| BAHRAM NASSERIZAFAR |
| INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION |
| 13-1827 |
| April 19, 2013 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Jobs |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Bahram Nasserizafar v. Indiana Department of Transpo |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
702082739
Filed Nonprecedential Disposition PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. William J. Bauer, Circuit Judge; Richard D. Cudahy, Circuit Judge and Diane S. Sykes, Circuit Judge. [6519189-1] [6519189] [13-1827]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Bahram Nasserizafar v. Indiana Department of Transpo | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: BAHRAM NASSERIZAFAR | |
| Represented By: | Bahram Nasserizafar |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION | |
| Represented By: | Erica S. Sullivan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
