Adam Locke v. Mya Haessig
Plaintiff - Appellee: ADAM A. LOCKE
Defendant - Appellant: MYA HAESSIG
Case Number: 13-1857
Filed: April 23, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner-Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 5, 2015 Summary Locke v. Haessig

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 702543322 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Hamilton. The district court's denial of summary judgment is AFFIRMED and the case is REMANDED for proceedings consistent with this opinion. Richard A. Posner, Circuit Judge; Ilana Diamond Rovner, Circuit Judge and David F. Hamilton, Circuit Judge. [6668498-1] [6668498] [13-1857]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Adam Locke v. Mya Haessig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: ADAM A. LOCKE
Represented By: Martin R. Stein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: MYA HAESSIG
Represented By: John J. Glinski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?