Etta Scott v. Westlake Services LLC
| ETTA SCOTT, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated |
| WESTLAKE SERVICES LLC, doing business as WESTLAKE FINANCIAL SERVICES |
| 13-2699 |
| August 2, 2013 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Consumer Credit |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
702157454
Filed opinion of the court by Judge Hamilton. We REVERSE the judgment dismissing the case as moot and REMAND to the district court for proceedings consistent with the opinion. Daniel A. Manion, Circuit Judge; Ilana Diamond Rovner, Circuit Judge and David F. Hamilton, Circuit Judge. [6547181-1] [6547181] [13-2699]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Etta Scott v. Westlake Services LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: ETTA SCOTT, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated | |
| Represented By: | Dmitry N. Feofanov |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: WESTLAKE SERVICES LLC, doing business as WESTLAKE FINANCIAL SERVICES | |
| Represented By: | David L. Hartsell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
