Ronald Warren v. Carolyn Colvin
RONALD G. WARREN |
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security |
13-2921 |
August 30, 2013 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
D.I.W.C./D.I.W.W. |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 702271344 Filed Nonprecedential Disposition PER CURIAM. The district court s denial of relief is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED with instructions to return the matter to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings consistent with this order. William J. Bauer, Circuit Judge; Michael S. Kanne, Circuit Judge and John Daniel Tinder, Circuit Judge. [6590150-1] [6590150] [13-2921] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Ronald Warren v. Carolyn Colvin | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: RONALD G. WARREN | |
Represented By: | William Edward Jenner |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security | |
Represented By: | Thomas E. Kieper |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.