Fares Pawn, LLC, et al v. State of Indiana, Department o, et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit Fares Pawn, LLC, et al v. State of Indiana, Department o, et al

Fares Pawn, LLC, et al v. State of Indiana, Department o, et al

Plaintiff - Appellant:	FARES PAWN, LLC and WILLIAM K. SAALWAECHTER
Defendant - Appellee:	STATE OF INDIANA, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, CONSUMER CREDIT DIVISION, JOHN SCHROEDER, in his individual and official capacity as an employee with the Department of Financial Institutions, MARK TARPEY, in his individual and official capacity as an employee witht he Consumer Credit Division of the Department of Financial Institutions and DAVID H. MILLS, in his individual and official capacity as an employee with the Consumer Credit Division of the Department of Financial Institutions
Case Number:	13-3240
Filed:	October 10, 2013
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed	Description
June 20, 2014	Fares Pawn, LLC v. IN Dep't of Fin. Insts.
June 23, 2014	Fares Pawn, LLC v. State of Indiana, Department o

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 23, 2014	Filing 702257928 ORDER: The opinion of this Court issued on 06/23/2014 is corrected as follows: On page 2, lines 9 10, he sued DFI in federal court for violating should be changed to he sued DFI for violating . On page 9, lines 28 29, In October 2012, Saalwaechter sued the state of Indiana, DFI, and associated state officials under 42 U.S.C. 1983 should be changed to In October 2011, Saalwaechter sued DFI and associated state officials in the Vanderburgh County Superior Court under 42 U.S.C. 1983; the case was later removed to federal court . [6585182-1] [6585182] [13-3240]
June 20, 2014	Filing 702256159 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Flaum. AFFIRMED. Richard A. Posner, Circuit Judge; Joel M. Flaum, Circuit Judge and Ilana Diamond Rovner, Circuit Judge. [6584497-1] [6584497] [13-3240]

Date Filed

Document Text

June 23, 2014

Filing 702257928 ORDER: The opinion of this Court issued on 06/23/2014 is corrected as follows: On page 2, lines 9 10, he sued DFI in federal court for violating should be changed to he sued DFI for violating . On page 9, lines 28 29, In October 2012, Saalwaechter sued the state of Indiana, DFI, and associated state officials under 42 U.S.C. 1983 should be changed to In October 2011, Saalwaechter sued DFI and associated state officials in the Vanderburgh County Superior Court under 42 U.S.C. 1983; the case was later removed to federal court . [6585182-1] [6585182] [13-3240]

June 20, 2014

Filing 702256159 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Flaum. AFFIRMED. Richard A. Posner, Circuit Judge; Joel M. Flaum, Circuit Judge and Ilana Diamond Rovner, Circuit Judge. [6584497-1] [6584497] [13-3240]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Fares Pawn, LLC, et al v. State of Indiana, Department o, et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: FARES PAWN, LLC
Represented By:	James D. Johnson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: WILLIAM K. SAALWAECHTER
Represented By:	James D. Johnson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: STATE OF INDIANA, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, CONSUMER CREDIT DIVISION
Represented By:	Corinne T. Gilchrist
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: JOHN SCHROEDER, in his individual and official capacity as an employee with the Department of Financial Institutions
Represented By:	Corinne T. Gilchrist
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: MARK TARPEY, in his individual and official capacity as an employee witht he Consumer Credit Division of the Department of Financial Institutions
Represented By:	Corinne T. Gilchrist
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: DAVID H. MILLS, in his individual and official capacity as an employee with the Consumer Credit Division of the Department of Financial Institutions
Represented By:	Corinne T. Gilchrist
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?