Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, In, et al v. Lac Du Flambeau Band of Lake, et al
| STIFEL, NICOLAUS & COMPANY, INC., STIFEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION, SAYBROOK FUND INVESTORS, LLC, LDF ACQUISITION, LLC, WELLS FARGO BANK, NA and GODFREY & KAHN |
| LAC DU FLAMBEAU BAND OF LAKE SUPERIOR CHIPPEWA INDIANS and LAKE OF THE TORCHES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION |
| 14-2150 |
| May 23, 2014 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Constitutionality of State Statutes |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc. v. Lac Du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians
|
|
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, In v. Lac Du Flambeau Band of Lake
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
702665858
ORDER: re: 1. The Tribal Entities' motion to correct clerical error in November 24, 2015 opinion. 2. Response of Godfrey & Kahn, S.C. to the Tribal Entities' motion to correct a clerical error in the November 24, 2015 opinion. [6713173-2] The motion is GRANTED. This court's opinion of November 24, 2015, is AMENDED as follows: In the first full sentence on page 39 of the opinion which currently reads, "Consequently, the Tribal Agreement does not 't[ie] the hands of the Tribe' in the same manner as the Indenture did" the term "Tribal Agreement" shall be replaced with "Tribal Resolution." [6714581-1] [6714581] [14-2150, 14-2287]
|
|
Filing
702654687
Filed opinion of the court by Judge Ripple. We therefore AFFIRM the judgment of the district court with respect to the grant of preliminary injunctive relief to the Financial Entities. We REVERSE, however, the district court s denial of preliminary injunctive relief to Godfrey. The district court erred in concluding that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Godfrey, and that error colored its view of Godfrey s likelihood of success on the merits. Godfrey, like the Financial Entities, may invoke the forum selection clauses in the Bond Documents and, consequently, is likely to succeed on its claim that the tribal court lacks jurisdiction over it in this bond-related action. We therefore REMAND to the district court for further proceedings to determine whether, given the other preliminary-injunction factors, an injunction should issue in favor of Godfrey. Joel M. Flaum, Circuit Judge; Kenneth F. Ripple, Circuit Judge and Ann Claire Williams, Circuit Judge. [6710424-1] [6710424] [14-2150, 14-2287]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
