USA v. Alexsis Garcia
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
ALEXSIS J. GARCIA, also known as ALEXIS JAMES GARCIA |
14-2368 |
June 24, 2014 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 702637924 Filed opinion of the court by District Judge Darrah. The case is REMANDED for resentencing. This will further provide the district court an opportunity to give clear justification for the length and conditions of supervised release and clarify its ruling as to the length of Garcia's sentence. Richard A. Posner, Circuit Judge; Michael S. Kanne, Circuit Judge and John W. Darrah, District Court Judge. [6703973-1] [6703973] [14-2368] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Alexsis Garcia | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | James M. Cutchin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellant: ALEXSIS J. GARCIA, also known as ALEXIS JAMES GARCIA | |
Represented By: | John R. Clemons |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.