Demetrius Boyd v. Gary Boughton
| DEMETRIUS M. BOYD |
| GARY A. BOUGHTON |
| 14-2809 |
| August 15, 2014 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
702587486
Filed opinion of the court by Judge Kanne. The district court's denial of Boyd's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is AFFIRMED. Richard A. Posner, Circuit Judge; Michael S. Kanne, Circuit Judge and John W. Darrah*, District Court Judge. (*The Honorable John W. Darrah, of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.) [6685068-1] [6685068] [14-2809]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Demetrius Boyd v. Gary Boughton | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner - appellant: DEMETRIUS M. BOYD | |
| Represented By: | Brian Thomas Fahl |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent - appellee: GARY A. BOUGHTON | |
| Represented By: | Sara Lynn Larson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
