Charles Donelson v. Randy Pfister
Petitioner - Appellant: CHARLES DONELSON
Respondent - Appellee: RANDY PFISTER
Case Number: 14-3395
Filed: October 29, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 28, 2016 Summary Donelson v. Pfister

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 702691522 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Hamilton. The district court's judgment is VACATED and the case REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Richard A. Posner, Circuit Judge; Ilana Diamond Rovner, Circuit Judge and David F. Hamilton, Circuit Judge. [6724494-1] [6724494] [14-3395]--[Edited 01/28/2016 by MM insert text before "REMANDED".]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Charles Donelson v. Randy Pfister
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: CHARLES DONELSON
Represented By: Charles Donelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: RANDY PFISTER
Represented By: Leah Myers Bendik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?