Motorola Mobility LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al
Petitioner: MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC
Respondent: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES LIMITED, HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION, LG DISPLAY COMPANY, LIMITED, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY, LIMITED, SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, TOSHIBA CORPORATION and SANYO CONSUMER ELECTRONICS COMPANY, LIMITED
Case Number: 14-8003
Filed: February 25, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 27, 2014 Summary Motorola Mobility LLC v. AU Optronics Corp.
July 1, 2014 Motorola Mobility LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation
November 26, 2014 Summary Motorola Mobility LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation
January 12, 2015 Summary Motorola Mobility LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 702453139 Filed AMENDED Opinion by Judge Posner. Original Opinion issued on 11/26/2014. (This amended opinion replaces the opinion in this case that was issued by the panel on November 26 and that is reported as 2014 WL 6678622.) [6633776] [14-8003]
November 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 702427089 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Posner. AFFIRMED. Richard A. Posner, Circuit Judge; Michael S. Kanne, Circuit Judge and Ilana Diamond Rovner, Circuit Judge. [6623761-1] [6623761] [14-8003]
March 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 702199172 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Posner. This case is before us on the plaintiff s unopposed petition for leave to take an interlocutory appeal, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b), from an order that the district judge has certified for an immediate appeal. We grant the petition for reasons explained below; and because the petition and the defendants response, together with the district judge s opinion explaining her order and the record in the district court, provide an ample basis for deciding the appeal, we dispense with further briefing and with oral argument. AFFIRMED. Richard A. Posner, Circuit Judge; Michael S. Kanne, Circuit Judge and Ilana Diamond Rovner, Circuit Judge. [6562702-1] [6562702] [14-8003]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Motorola Mobility LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC
Represented By: Jerome A. Murphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION
Represented By: Kirk C. Jenkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES LIMITED
Represented By: Terence H. Campbell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION
Represented By: Eugene E. Murphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: LG DISPLAY COMPANY, LIMITED
Represented By: Nathan P. Eimer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY, LIMITED
Represented By: Jeffrey M. Davidson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
Represented By: James A. Morsch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: TOSHIBA CORPORATION
Represented By: Daniel Cummings
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SANYO CONSUMER ELECTRONICS COMPANY, LIMITED
Represented By: William Yu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?