USA v. Humberto Fierro-Rascon
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| HUMBERTO FIERRO-RASCON, also known as HUMBERTO ARRAGON-RASCON |
| 15-1626 |
| March 23, 2015 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
702631502
Filed Nonprecedential Disposition PER CURIAM. Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, Fierro Rascon's motion to proceed pro se is DENIED and the appeal is DISMISSED. Joel M. Flaum, Circuit Judge; Ann Claire Williams, Circuit Judge and David F. Hamilton, Circuit Judge. [6660805-2] [6669035-2] [6701686-1] [6701686] [15-1626]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Humberto Fierro-Rascon | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | David J. Reinhard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant: HUMBERTO FIERRO-RASCON, also known as HUMBERTO ARRAGON-RASCON | |
| Represented By: | Mark P. Maciolek |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
