Michael Magruder v. Fidelity Brokerage Services
| MICHAEL MAGRUDER |
| FIDELITY BROKERAGE SERVICES, LLC |
| 15-1846 |
| April 20, 2015 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Arbitration |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Magruder v. Fidelity Brokerage Servs., LLC
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
702722705
Filed opinion of the court by Judge Easterbrook. The judgment of the district court is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED with instructions to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Diane P. Wood, Chief Judge; Richard A. Posner, Circuit Judge and Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge. [6736602-1] [6736602] [15-1846]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Michael Magruder v. Fidelity Brokerage Services | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: MICHAEL MAGRUDER | |
| Represented By: | Michael Magruder |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: FIDELITY BROKERAGE SERVICES, LLC | |
| Represented By: | John S. Monical |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
