William Bridge v. New Holland Logansport, Incorp
| WILLIAM BRIDGE |
| NEW HOLLAND LOGANSPORT, INCORPORATED |
| 15-1935 |
| April 30, 2015 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Jobs |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Bridge v. New Holland Logansport, Inc.
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
702717071
Filed opinion of the court by Judge Shah. AFFIRMED. Diane P. Wood, Chief Judge; Ilana Diamond Rovner, Circuit Judge and Manish S. Shah,* District Court Judge. (*Of the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.) [6734565-1] [6734565] [15-1935]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: William Bridge v. New Holland Logansport, Incorp | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: WILLIAM BRIDGE | |
| Represented By: | Quincy E. Sauer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: NEW HOLLAND LOGANSPORT, INCORPORATED | |
| Represented By: | Lyle Raymond Hardman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
