James Blasius v. Angel Automotive Inc.
| JAMES BLASIUS |
| ANGEL AUTOMOTIVE INC., an Indiana Corporation |
| 15-2994 |
| September 14, 2015 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Contract Product Liability |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
702860859
Filed opinion of the court by Judge Blakey. The judgment of the district court is REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Daniel A. Manion, Circuit Judge; Ilana Diamond Rovner, Circuit Judge and John Robert Blakey, District Court Judge. [6789585-1] [6789585] [15-2994]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: James Blasius v. Angel Automotive Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: JAMES BLASIUS | |
| Represented By: | Brandon J. Wilson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: ANGEL AUTOMOTIVE INC., an Indiana Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Linda A. Polley |
| Represented By: | Andrew S. Williams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
