Marshall McDaniel v. Zach Roeckeman
| MARSHALL MCDANIEL |
| ZACH ROECKEMAN, Warden, Big Muddy River Correctional Center |
| 15-3638 |
| November 25, 2015 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
702935026
Filed opinion of the court by Judge Kanne. AFFIRMED. Joel M. Flaum, Circuit Judge; Michael S. Kanne, Circuit Judge and Jane E. Magnus-Stinson, Chief District Court Judge. [6817842-1] [6817842] [15-3638]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Marshall McDaniel v. Zach Roeckeman | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner - appellant: MARSHALL MCDANIEL | |
| Represented By: | Michael Anthony Scodro |
| Represented By: | Jennifer T. Beach |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent - appellee: ZACH ROECKEMAN, Warden, Big Muddy River Correctional Center | |
| Represented By: | Erin O'Connell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
