Raymond Severson v. Heartland Woodcraft, Incorpora
RAYMOND SEVERSON |
HEARTLAND WOODCRAFT, INCORPORATED |
15-3754 |
December 11, 2015 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Family and Medical Leave Act |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Severson v. Heartland Woodcraft, Inc. |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 703258997 THIS ENTRY HAS BEEN REMOVED AS ENTERED IN ERROR. [6941533-1] [6941533] [15-3754] --[Edited 07/30/2018 by ER - REMOVED AS ENTERED IN ERROR] |
Filing 703075092 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Sykes. AFFIRMED. Diane P. Wood, Chief Judge; Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge and Diane S. Sykes, Circuit Judge. [6870567-1] [6870567] [15-3754] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Raymond Severson v. Heartland Woodcraft, Incorpora | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: RAYMOND SEVERSON | |
Represented By: | Kelly L. Temeyer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: HEARTLAND WOODCRAFT, INCORPORATED | |
Represented By: | David A. McClurg |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.